Hillary Clinton Changes Her Tune on Marijuana Policy

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton seems to have changed her mind when it comes to marijuana policy, according to National Journal. Clinton had previously expressed that she did not want marijuana decriminalized, but thought research ought to be done into its benefits. On Tuesday, she appeared to be more acquiescent to a change in the law. Clinton called for more research to be done, without doubting the medical benefits. Hillary stopped short of making an endorsement, saying, “I think we need to be very clear about the benefits of marijuana use for medicinal purposes. I don’t think we’ve done enough research yet.”

When she came to the issue of whether it should be legal for adults to use, Clinton said that states like Colorado and Washington have already reformed and that they are “laboratories of democracy.” Clinton claims to be holding out on forming her opinion until she has the evidence from the two states. Her change of heart mirrors that of the Democratic Party, which, as of late, has become more amenable to the case for making marijuana legal for adults to use, medically or otherwise.

15 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton Changes Her Tune on Marijuana Policy”

  1. Hillary begins by stating younger people could help her answer the questions about cannabis. She wants to appeal to younger voters.

    She wants clarity on the benefits of medical cannabis, and wants more research. For anecdotal effectiveness she is for availability to patients under appropriate circumstances. I guess that means the feds should stay the hell out of states that have legalized medical cannabis. I mean, if you have feds in there effing with things patients are going to lose out.

    Regarding legal recreational cannabis she thinks states are the laboratory of democracy, although she flubbed it and pronounced it as “labatory”. She wants to wait and see the evidence from the two states that have adult retail.

    (watched the video interviews with Hillary on CNN on HighTimes, and then watched the HighTimes video on Bill Clinton’s interview with Jorge Ramos)
    Here are my follow-up questions:

    1. If you want more research about it’s benefits, then are you for removing cannabis from Schedule I, if not from the schedule altogether?

    2. Why are the states laboratories of democracy for only recreational cannabis and not also for medicinal cannabis?

    3. What areas of evidence about adult recreational cannabis do you mean? Your husband admitted in an interview with Jorge Ramos that he wasn’t sure if legal cannabis would eliminate gang violence.

    4. Your husband, Bill, said he never denied he used marijuana in that same interview with Jorge Ramos. I don’t blame you for denying it, but do you really expect me to believe you didn’t even try it when you were younger?

    5. If Bill was toking it up and you are telling the truth, Hillary, then who was he toking it up with? He has a reputation as having been quite the womanizer back in the day, so was he smoking it up with the other women and all the stories about the sex the cover-up. A little bit of both? Better yet, just forget I asked this question because if Bill was toking it up it was likely with more than just the women, who could been who he got it off of, you know, and anybody else guys or gals just want to stay in the cannabis closet.

    NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly was on a different video on Fusion from HT link and he said black market cannabis in Colorado was cheaper than legal, think I saw that on one of those tv documentaries with a guy hiding his face saying that. It’s still street weed, and you take the seller’s word because there’s no testing and labeling. When the hell was the last time you bought street weed that came with a name and labeling like legal Colorado cannabis? Kelly never said whether he was for or against cannabis being in Schedule I, just that it was something for the Supreme Court’s involvement and then later that it was something for Congress.

    Kelly said politicians ought to have a wait and see attitude about issues regarding legal recreational in Colorado and Washington. He wants to see if cannabis is a gateway to other drugs. The illegal sellers still might be offering other drugs out of the other pocket. Legal sellers will absolutely not be selling coke, heroin, meth, XTC, whatever.

    Kelly ended the interview saying that both medical and recreational are illegal at the federal level and it’s something that will be decided by the Supreme Court.

    The Supreme Court! You mean the Supreme Court ruled against medical cannabis already, like in Gonzales versus Raich, and nobody freakin’ gives a shit. States are still doing it. More states are legalizing for medical purposes, and others are planning on legalizing recreational.

    The Supreme Court ruled, and the Supreme Court is wrong, and nobody gives a shit what the Supreme Court wrote regarding cannabis except for people like Kelly.

    I just can’t see Hillary getting young people to vote for her if she doesn’t say she’s for removing cannabis from the Schedule, at least from Schedule I. I mean, she’s got to be smart enough to grasp we want the feds to stop blocking medical research into the good things about cannabis.

  2. …Colorado and Washington have already reformed and that they are “laboratories of democracy.” Clinton claims to be holding out on forming her opinion until she has the evidence from the two states.

    This “experimental” narrative is disturbing given the fact that Colorado and Washington are in no way or in any instance “laboratories”.

    The free States of Colorado and Washington are two sovereign States in a union of fifty States known , Worldwide, as The United States of America.

    Both of these free States are governed by the rule of Law.

    This experimental/temporary narrative plays fast and loose with the very concept of Law!

    If any “law” is an experiment , then all laws must be seen as temporary experiments for those awaiting the “results”?

    The Citizens of each one of the fifty States in our union decide the law.

    The Constitutional duty of those persons we Citizens hire/elect is to simply codify the will of the People…according to the will of the People.

    There is no experiment pending in the free States of Colorado and Washington.

    Ms. Clinton is quite mistaken.

    The free Citizens of Colorado and Washington simply decided to permanently dismiss a wrongful law.

    The law is the law or it isn’t!

    Which will it be?…time will surely tell.

    If I ever meet any politician who doesn’t speak out of both sides of their mouths…I won’t wash my hand after I shake theirs!

  3. I believe Hilary is all for removing it from Schedule I but don’t blame her for taking a cautious approach. She may stand to alienate enough voters if she were to show unwavering support. Also, it would give the GOP a fear-mongering attacking point. And really, no need to make the splash as the ship has finally started to come about on the efficacy of medical marijuana and it’s relatively harmless recreational use. My vote in the next election will be based solely on the candidate’s position on marijuana. But that’s only because I don’t believe anything else they spew…

  4. My vote in the next election will be based solely on the candidate’s position on marijuana. – Mike

    Mike’s comment illustrates a growing awareness that cannabis legalization is fast becoming an important to critical issue among potential voters.

    Those politicians who plan on being re-elected/ re-hired would be wise to take notice…and act accordingly to the will of the people who will either send them back to their office or send them looking for another job.

  5. Does anyone know Illinois candidate Bruce ( 1%er) Rauner’s position on medical cannabis and cannabis legalization?

    Illinois needs a 1%er Governor like cotton pickers needed an Overseer?

    I’m positive every person who believes HB 1 should survive
    after the four year sunset/expiration date will vote for our Governor Quinn.

    Super Rich Republican Rauner may be opposed to medical cannabis?…who knows???

    I have no idea how a man who makes over 50 million bucks per year can’t afford a 50 dollar watch?…unless he is pretending to be a “common man of the People”.

    Why would anyone so $uper Rich want to be Governor of The State of Illinois?

    Perhaps the super rich have run out of stuff to buy?

    Are our States the new $tatus $ymbol?

    A vote for Pat Quinn is a vote for a man who possesses genuine compassion for those he represents.

    A vote for Rauner is a vote for a 1%er who thinks we are fools who can be manipulated with his personal fortune?

    I sincerely hope we prove him wrong!…at the voting booth.

  6. This is from the same politician who was calling for a ramping up on the war of drugs a few years ago. Can we really trust her?

    We need a real progressive who is a solid pro-cannabis candidate in the DNC, not a lukewarm, 1%-coddling, DEA-huggin pseudo-liberal like Clinton.

  7. I’m sorry to need to say this, but you fellows have given me a headache. Ms. Clinton’s remarks were clear and in plain English as lawyers are taught to communicate early on, and you guys have rocketed off like super-balls on a racquetball court and created a huge snarl of string about a yard high. Colorado has legalized and is, so far, regulating cannabis use in an extremely conservative manner (too bad nobody can do that with alcohol, tobacco, and deadly chemical drugs including Rx). The main things outrageous about our legalized marijuana are the 25% tax and 1 unbelievably hysterical witch on Denver city council who is sure that if a minor sees cannabis in use the minor will be bent for life, so everything should remain behind closed doors. Heh.

  8. Unless Hillary Clinton comes out and declares that she will fight for the re-legalization of cannabis and do every thing in her power to remove cannabis from schedule one, I will not vote for her.

  9. well hillary that reaserch they did on all the addictive pain medication did the USA no good what so ever i think the government including the FDA who nstill passed the patent probally contribution were paid to the campain. I beleave the FDA should be sued for all the people who have gotten hooked on them. Marijuana has never had that addictive quality the pills do. the funny part about it is the citizens pay the price for all of your mistakes. I will smoke marijuana for pain before i ever take another opoid painkiller in my life and you no what when i stop im not sick for 20 days or at all for that matter so you guys really need to take a good look at your research because the government has cause more problems and never take reasponsability for your own actions. I think you guys should start listeing to the people in this country and maybe it wouldnt be in the position it’s in today. one more thing i think you guy should figure out what schedule drugs mean because everyone in this country know and admits marijuana is not schedule 1 maybe 61 tobacco should be schedule 1 because it’s the most addictive drug than the rest of any drug in my opinion

  10. The political state of New York is corrupt and seeking to keep marijuana as a schedule 1 classified drug thanks to Andrew Coumo and his against the will of the people, and for his lobbyers; Big Pharma, alcohol and the most dangerous of them all; DEA and police propaganda.

    Even though he seems to kind of accept medical marijuana his guidelines make organics impossible to use, ailment qualifications are so few that 95% of applicants will not qualify, legalizing it is out of the question and he is part of the organization to take Colorado and Washington’s people’s choice action and propaganda turn it into an illegal activity.

  11. I think it should be legalized in all fifty states alcahol is legal and we have deaths everyday from drunk drivers normally people who smoke pot or marihuana are non violent and just want to be peaceful I’ve smoked lots of pot in my 40 years of life and it’s never caused me to have bad judgement or get violent the most adverse effect I’ve ever had was the munchies I’m all for legalization in the entire United States not only for medical but for recreational use I’m a vet suffering from PTSD I am on so many pills to control blood pressure anxiety and numerous other ailments but nothing calms me down or takes the pain away like smoking a joint this goes out to all you men and women of congress outlaw the real drug alcohol leave the pot smokers alone who’s ever seen a angry pot head no one because it take the anger and turns it into peace and friendship signed a vet with a serious problem with this so called free country were not free we’re more of a communism that China or Russia do this or do that by our rules or you’ll go to prison hell you can rape a woman or molest a child and get less time than if you get caught with a joint now where is the sain logic in that we the people need to take back our country and get rid of all this political bullshit

  12. I don’t care what she says she is evil period and will never get my vote. Oh and the research has been done, more is being done but the 30,000 papers on marijuana is enough evidence already to take off the drug schedule.

  13. Why is anyone surprised at politicians acting like politicians?

    Everyone has two sides of their mouth…Politicians/Lawyers are taught( early on) to speak out of both sides… fluently …if falsely.

    I will vote for Ms. Clinton if she advocates cannabis legalization…just in case it’s true?

    Who would have ever thought cannabis legalization would become a deciding issue among voters?

  14. I have multiple sclerosis, I am a female 39 yrs. Old. Marijuana helps with pain for me, spasticity, & anxiety, not to mention head aches & nausea. I believe I shouldn’t have to feel like a mother who is abudising a drug. It would take the anxiety of me more. I’m a Christian lady & I just wanna have less anxiety over this issue! If alcohol which is so deadly can be legal. Why can’t marijuana? Thnx your friend Chrissy Riedmiller

  15. I am a therapeutic musician and while doing research on healing arts therapies I discovered that big pharm funds 60% of clinical testing and also outsources to third world countries for these tests for all those prescription drugs with a long list of side effects including death, which the FDA approves!

    We have technology such as MRI, CT scans, brain scans that prove that some alternative medicines do work! If we could change the random clinical testing used on meds to our new technology methods — we will prove without a doubt that it works better than any manufactured drug out there. You may understand how much money cancer brings in the billions to the health care industry. Is the same reason that big pharm, politicians, insurance, etc are trying to avoid approving this natural drug!

    We have some of the best soil and fresh water in the world in Illinois. Farming industry is in big trouble with the droughts–it seems like common sense to use our land again for farming organic food and pot to improve our economy and quality of life! Instead I see empty parking lots and empty warehouses using up this valuable land with what they call progress? If I could change the world with some good dirt and water, I would feed the entire world and light up a fatty! Let’s get busy people –we the people are in charge of these idiots in government–stop acting so powerless and speak up!
    Love and light, Sharone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>